abstinence, Bioethics, politics, public health, public policy, Sex ed, Sexuality, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Sexually Transmitted Infections, STD's

New study on virginity pledges and behavior

The article in question can be downloaded from Pediatrics, here.

The final “wave 3” data came from the group that the author calls “adolescents” — who were 22 years old. Data from those who had married was treated as “missing.”

We don’t know anything about the actual sex ed courses that the students took, who paid for the course, or whether they actually took a course or just made a pledge.

From the article: “Virginity pledges are also now used to measure AOSE program effectiveness, which the US government considers successful if they produce many virginity pledgers, irrespective of participants’ sexual behavior.”

(Is it true that the pledge is considered a marker for the success of abstinence-only sex ed? I know that I’ve read several articles showing short term increase in the intention to remain abstinent, so that would not surprise me. However, I haven’t seen this “marker.”)

As far as I can tell, it appears that the author took data from a series of national questionnaires , matched kids for background and family, and found that they have similar outcomes after 5 years.

Oddly, a huge number – 80% – of the pledgers denied having pledged in follow up. The other number that seems to stick out is that the non-pledgers did pay for sex and/or get paid for sex more often.

Nevertheless, the only study that I’ve seen that measured pregnancy rates after a course that included teaching proper condom use did not show prevention of pregnancy, either. I posted a review of the pay-for-view article in the British Medical Journal.

About bnuckols

Conservative Christian Family Doctor, promoting conservative news and views. (Hot Air under the right wing!)


One thought on “New study on virginity pledges and behavior

  1. >"Is it true that the pledge is considered a marker for the success of abstinence-only sex ed?"It depends on who is doing the evaluation – if the evaluator wants to make the program look good, yes. Also, it's used as a metric when doing very short-term evaluations, simply because there is no better metric that doesn't involve waiting for years.

    Posted by Suricou Raven | January 8, 2009, 11:29 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

If the post is missing: take the “www.” out of the url

@bnuckols Twitter




%d bloggers like this: