LifeEthics
Uncategorized
Wesley Smith on "Why they did it."
I’ve already gone on record that no one considered that any of us would notice or care that the so-called ethical embryonic stem cell technique was most certainly not ethical. Wesley Smith, in an op-ed for the Center for Bioethics and Culture, suggests that the post-modern media wants us to remember that the only reason … Continue reading
>Wesley Smith on "Why they did it."
>I’ve already gone on record that no one considered that any of us would notice or care that the so-called ethical embryonic stem cell technique was most certainly not ethical. Wesley Smith, in an op-ed for the Center for Bioethics and Culture, suggests that the post-modern media wants us to remember that the only reason … Continue reading
Stem cell non-event explained
My theory? No one even considered that anyone would care. Surely, the peer reviewers weren’t in on a conspiracy. At least Lanza, et. al., got their money’s worth from the press release guys! There is no way to do justice to the blogger’s post and the incredibly informative guest comment by copying and pasting it … Continue reading
>Stem cell non-event explained
>My theory? No one even considered that anyone would care. Surely, the peer reviewers weren’t in on a conspiracy. At least Lanza, et. al., got their money’s worth from the press release guys! There is no way to do justice to the blogger’s post and the incredibly informative guest comment by copying and pasting it … Continue reading
"Deja vu, all over again"
Wesley Smith supplies my title (quoting that great observer, Yogi Berra) and a synopsis of Advanced Cell Technology’s history of big claim, small retraction, ignored critics, rinse and repeat.Take a look at his recap, “Science by Press Release,” at the Weekly Standard. Note at 11:30 AM: I’m rewriting the post originally referenced in this one.
>"Deja vu, all over again"
>Wesley Smith supplies my title (quoting that great observer, Yogi Berra) and a synopsis of Advanced Cell Technology’s history of big claim, small retraction, ignored critics, rinse and repeat.Take a look at his recap, “Science by Press Release,” at the Weekly Standard. Note at 11:30 AM: I’m rewriting the post originally referenced in this one.
(Deleted)Another chapter of "Ethicist for Hire"?
I’m pulling this post for a rewrite – I fell off my train of thought in the middle. If I can keep my analogies straight, I’ll republish it later. Sorry for the inconvenience.
>(Deleted)Another chapter of "Ethicist for Hire"?
>I’m pulling this post for a rewrite – I fell off my train of thought in the middle. If I can keep my analogies straight, I’ll republish it later. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Obligatory Gratuitous Propaganda
I don’t normally get my bioethics news from “ThisisLondon.co.uk, the entertainment guide“ In this case, however, the first notice I had about the letter from 14 leaders in charity funding for stem cell research had written to the London Times was in that prestigious publication. While cautioning against the risks of unproven stem cell experiments, … Continue reading
>Obligatory Gratuitous Propaganda
>I don’t normally get my bioethics news from “ThisisLondon.co.uk, the entertainment guide“ In this case, however, the first notice I had about the letter from 14 leaders in charity funding for stem cell research had written to the London Times was in that prestigious publication. While cautioning against the risks of unproven stem cell experiments, … Continue reading
Visit WingRight
- “American Fiction,” the movie – and life
- Maternal Morbidity with Premature Rupture of Membranes
- Counterintuitive abortion report
- Paris at Café de la Paix
- Political, purposeful lies (Francis Collins & Anthony Fauci)
- Comprehensive review of Texas’ Heartbeat Act
- Biden to Ask OSHA to Mandate Vaccines at Businesses With 100 or More Workers
- Long Post Reviewing COVID19 Myths
- Afghanistan: Read this
- Conversation with January 6 protester
LifeEthics 