LifeEthics
Archive for January 12, 2006
>My Letter in Scientific American
>Scientific American published a biased little op-ed in their October 2005 “SA Perspectives” titled “Fill This Prescription” concerning pharmacists who refuse to fill prescriptions that they consider harmful, saying, It is tempting to wonder how far the principle of denying medicines for ethical reasons could stretch. Could one who disapproves of homosexuality refuse antiretrovirals to … Continue reading
My Letter in Scientific American
Scientific American published a biased little op-ed in their October 2005 “SA Perspectives” titled “Fill This Prescription” concerning pharmacists who refuse to fill prescriptions that they consider harmful, saying, It is tempting to wonder how far the principle of denying medicines for ethical reasons could stretch. Could one who disapproves of homosexuality refuse antiretrovirals to … Continue reading
>Pro-life need not apply
>Speaking of ethics in reporting about scientific research, there hasn’t been much coverage of the study out of New Zealand that concludes that abortion hurts women and the difficulty the authors had in finding a publisher, as noted by Stuff.co.nz , an – ? or should I say “the”? -on-line New Zealand news source: There … Continue reading
Pro-life need not apply
Speaking of ethics in reporting about scientific research, there hasn’t been much coverage of the study out of New Zealand that concludes that abortion hurts women and the difficulty the authors had in finding a publisher, as noted by Stuff.co.nz , an – ? or should I say “the”? -on-line New Zealand news source: There … Continue reading
>Scientific Journal Rivalry?
>The scientific journal, Nature, devotes quite a bit of its space in the January 12, 2006 issue to two editorials and one review article concerning ethics, peer review, and the spectacular failure of both in the publication of the “results” of the Korean veterinarian, Hwang Wu Suk, in the cloning of human embryos for the … Continue reading
Scientific Journal Rivalry?
The scientific journal, Nature, devotes quite a bit of its space in the January 12, 2006 issue to two editorials and one review article concerning ethics, peer review, and the spectacular failure of both in the publication of the “results” of the Korean veterinarian, Hwang Wu Suk, in the cloning of human embryos for the … Continue reading
Visit WingRight
- Denouement: The Death of #SB303 May 20, 2013
- Cloned human embryos announced May 16, 2013
- My Testimony on #SB303 (Conscience, Rights, Medical Judgment and Law) May 16, 2013
- Public Health Hearing on #SB303 May 14, 2013
- Review of “Life After Life:A Novel” (. . .and now, for something completely different) May 14, 2013
- Office of the Governor Rick Perry – [Press Release] Statement by Gov. Rick Perry on the Kermit Gosnell Verdict May 13, 2013
- Going Too Far with DNR? | Texas Catholic Conference May 12, 2013
- More than “a list of endorsements” (with Addendum) May 11, 2013
- Alzheimer’s sufferer, 76, dies from snake bite after his family chooses NOT to give him anti-venom so he can ‘die with dignity’ May 11, 2013
- Breast Cancer Research: “Parity induces differentiation and reduces Wnt/Notch signaling ratio and proliferation potential of basal stem/progenitor cells isolated from mouse mammary” epithelium May 11, 2013
