>I pointed out the irony of using this term for destructive embryonic stem cell research in my last post. And I was reminded again, in Nat Henthoff’s latest column, “The Devaluing of Life,” in which he quotes Jesse Jackson: The boy’s spontaneous insistence on the primacy of life also reminded me of a powerful pro-life … Continue reading
I pointed out the irony of using this term for destructive embryonic stem cell research in my last post. And I was reminded again, in Nat Henthoff’s latest column, “The Devaluing of Life,” in which he quotes Jesse Jackson: The boy’s spontaneous insistence on the primacy of life also reminded me of a powerful pro-life … Continue reading
>Several medical centers, including Harvard,the University of California at Irvine, and the University of Texas at Houston are bragging in the press that they are not stymied at all by the Bush Administration policy on funding embryonic stem cell research. Why there’s even an “underground railroad” for stem cell research funded by two moms in … Continue reading
Several medical centers, including Harvard,the University of California at Irvine, and the University of Texas at Houston are bragging in the press that they are not stymied at all by the Bush Administration policy on funding embryonic stem cell research. Why there’s even an “underground railroad” for stem cell research funded by two moms in … Continue reading
>Len Doyal, Emeritus Professor of Medical Ethics, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, is the British non-physician “ethicist” who claims that doctors should have the legal right to intentionally and purposefully act to kill their patients, even without consent. The paper, titled “Dignity in dying should include the legalization of non-voluntary euthanasia,” … Continue reading
Len Doyal, Emeritus Professor of Medical Ethics, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, is the British non-physician “ethicist” who claims that doctors should have the legal right to intentionally and purposefully act to kill their patients, even without consent. The paper, titled “Dignity in dying should include the legalization of non-voluntary euthanasia,” … Continue reading
>The FDA has published a new rule which would allow investigational testing on samples “left over” from the usual testing in the event of a public health emergency, such as a terrorist attack. The Seattle Post-Intelligencer is reporting the new rule as though it is controversial. I do not believe that there is any ethical … Continue reading
The FDA has published a new rule which would allow investigational testing on samples “left over” from the usual testing in the event of a public health emergency, such as a terrorist attack. The Seattle Post-Intelligencer is reporting the new rule as though it is controversial. I do not believe that there is any ethical … Continue reading
>I’m back and happy to report that there was sun and sand left over. And that walking in the surf and sand is good for a broken toe. But, what should I write about on my first post back? Art Caplan and the editors at blogbioethics.net were kind enough to help me out by publishing … Continue reading
I’m back and happy to report that there was sun and sand left over. And that walking in the surf and sand is good for a broken toe. But, what should I write about on my first post back? Art Caplan and the editors at blogbioethics.net were kind enough to help me out by publishing … Continue reading