>Go read Nigel Cameron’s Choosing Tomorrow, today! (I can’t resist red buttons marked “push” or puns.) I’ve been writing a piece on “Public Health Ethics,” part of which I dredged up for my comment on this remark of Dr. Cameron’s, “Bioethics” is an optical illusion. Which is not to say that we don’t need IRBs … Continue reading
Go read Nigel Cameron’s Choosing Tomorrow, today! (I can’t resist red buttons marked “push” or puns.) I’ve been writing a piece on “Public Health Ethics,” part of which I dredged up for my comment on this remark of Dr. Cameron’s, “Bioethics” is an optical illusion. Which is not to say that we don’t need IRBs … Continue reading
>From BetterHumans, the Kurzweil blog: NewsA Noteworthy Purchase of Votes(From NY1). It should be no new news that public funds are used to buy votes, but it is noteworthy, to me at least, that the battle over directing taxes poured into the trough to embryonic stem cell research has settled this far: “He’s calling for … Continue reading
From BetterHumans, the Kurzweil blog: NewsA Noteworthy Purchase of Votes(From NY1). It should be no new news that public funds are used to buy votes, but it is noteworthy, to me at least, that the battle over directing taxes poured into the trough to embryonic stem cell research has settled this far: “He’s calling for … Continue reading
>There’s an excellent review of Richard Dawkin’s book (here’s my comments from last October, “Measuring a Universe Without God,” when Dawkins was selling his book on NPR’s The Talk of the Nation and other media), with answers to many of his near-points free online at the New York Review of Books website. I hadn’t heard … Continue reading
There’s an excellent review of Richard Dawkin’s book (here’s my comments from last October, “Measuring a Universe Without God,” when Dawkins was selling his book on NPR’s The Talk of the Nation and other media), with answers to many of his near-points free online at the New York Review of Books website. I hadn’t heard … Continue reading